It's interesting that this newsletter is now on its 47th issue, which suggests a steady commitment to rounding up social venture news. I wonder, though, whether a recurring digest format risks blending together over time, since each edition covers 'various' updates without an obvious throughline. Does the publication track how readers actually use these roundups, or measure whether the aggregation leads to deeper engagement with the ventures themselves rather than just skimming headlines?
![[소셜벤처 뉴스레터] 제46호 다양한 소셜벤처 소식을 한눈에](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/aa89a3_bca4dc1ea44347febd1a14370f3de265~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_980,h_770,al_c,q_85,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,enc_avif,quality_auto/aa89a3_bca4dc1ea44347febd1a14370f3de265~mv2.jpg)
![[소셜벤처 뉴스레터] 제45호 다양한 소셜벤처 소식을 한눈에](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/aa89a3_8919731c9c34473ea928f3e299902d87~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_980,h_770,al_c,q_85,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,enc_avif,quality_auto/aa89a3_8919731c9c34473ea928f3e299902d87~mv2.jpg)
![[소셜벤처 뉴스레터] 제44호 다양한 소셜벤처 소식을 한눈에](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/aa89a3_ddef0dce44954a59b36d68f4c7723f37~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_980,h_770,al_c,q_85,usm_0.66_1.00_0.01,enc_avif,quality_auto/aa89a3_ddef0dce44954a59b36d68f4c7723f37~mv2.jpg)
.png){kind=small}
It's interesting that this newsletter is now on its 47th issue, which suggests a steady commitment to rounding up social venture news. I wonder, though, whether a recurring digest format risks blending together over time, since each edition covers 'various' updates without an obvious throughline. Does the publication track how readers actually use these roundups, or measure whether the aggregation leads to deeper engagement with the ventures themselves rather than just skimming headlines?
Useful reference: https://slayer2.org/